Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Fong: Why I prefer to be a veep

Exclusive Interview with Malaysiakini
Stanley Koh
The MCA poll on Oct 18 can hold little trepidation for vice-president Fong Chan Onn, for this will be his fifth outing in a contest that he has comfortably won twice before.Having held the post for 11 years now, he explained why he has chosen not to aim higher, despite rampant speculation that he would do so.“The MCA is currently at the crossroads. With my experience and economic background, I can serve the party in specific areas,” Fong had written in his blogspot after declaring his candidacy for one of the four elected vice-presidential slots. During the interview, he elaborated on this: “My strength is in the area of economics. I believe that, with my knowledge, experience and expertise, I can help the party leaders to formulate an economic roadmap which in turn can contribute to our nation’s efforts in facing prevailing economics-related challenges.“….and this explains why I am not contesting the No. 1 and 2 posts. I truly believe that I am able to play a (better) role as a vice- president, contributing to economic development.”However, he is critical of the MCA policy to restrict the presidency and various top posts to a three-term tenure, saying this must be reviewed.Fong, 64, argued the policy creates more disadvantages than advantages: “While it creates more opportunities (for younger leaders), the disadvantage is that the party will lose more experienced leaders.”Asked why he had endorsed the policy when it was proposed, he said this was “because I was a minister then….with vested interests”. “There should be more flexibility in implementing it. In the past, it was an unwritten understanding (that a leader cannot hold a government post for a long time), but there was never a written guideline.“For example, hypothetically, if Ong Ka Ting (right) serves his third term until it expires in 2011 or 2012, a change in president will be necessary. (Since this will coincide with the next general election, it could) affect the party’s performance.”He agreed that the leadership profile should be representative of all age groups to ensure continuity and gradual renewal, and that “delegates will look at the leader’s capability and not the age factor”.

Vocal response
On the party’s relationship with Umno, Fong cited the existence of ‘inbuilt understanding’ by way of “body language” among the three major ethnic-based parties in the ruling coalition Barisan Nasional (BN).“I was deputy education minister for 8 to 9 years. Whenever we mention Chinese education, they (Umno) know what the community needs,” he explained.“Although MCA is Chinese-based, Malaysians want the leadership to be more vocal on many other national issues affecting them, for example on issues like public safety, corruption and use of the Internal Security Act (ISA).“We spoke out in all sincerity against the ISA detention of (DAP parliamentarian) Teresa Kok. I am of the opinion that even (blogger) Raja Petra (Kamarudin) need not be detained under the ISA. He has written a lot. If the government thinks that these materials violate provisions of the (Sedition) Act, then charge him under this law.”On public perceptions of reform within MCA, Fong disagreed that the party’s vocal stand since the March general election was merely to project a new image. “This is what the people want to see. They do not want the party to react to issues in a week or two but immediately.”
Economic pie 'shrinking’
Fong, who is also the party’s Economics Bureau chairperson, has been a strong proponent of liberalising restrictive policies and reviewing outdated guidelines, to respond to globalisation.This, he said, would, improve the environment for trade and commerce, as well as enable more effective competition with neighbouring countries.On the New Economic Policy, Fong warned that the “shrinking economic pie” from year to year will affect bread-and-butter issues, especially with worsening inflation due mainly to higher petrol prices.“We cannot waste any more time. We must liberalise (our economy) from the quota system, relax this restriction and be competitive with China, India and other Asean countries like Vietnam,” he said.“If I am re-elected vice-president, I will help the party to draw up an economic blueprint. I will conduct a nationwide roadshow to explain (this to the grassroots) and obtain their feedback for consensus on economic-related decisions (and submit it via the party’s leadership) to the government.“Another important area is the government’s role in assisting small- and medium-scale enterprises. MCA will continue to contribute to this.”Fong further said Malaysia must be prepared for the fallout from economic and financial turmoil in the US, among other countries.“We must be prepared. We must explain to the ground and the government must prepare contingency plans to face these challenges just as we did during the 1997 financial currency crisis.”Another major challenge for the nation, he said, is to deal with the impact of the brain-drain. He cited Singapore’s success in stemming corruption and financial leakages by improving salary and wage structures. Fong, an electrical engineer by training, later obtained a doctorate in business administration. He was dean of the faculty of economics and administration at Universiti Malaya when former MCA president Dr Ling Liong Sik ‘helicoptered’ him into the party in 1990.(The term refers to a party candidate being recruited to a political post without undergoing the tedious process of rank-and-file promotion.)He was appointed deputy education minister (October 1990-December 1999), then promoted to cabinet minister with the human resources portfolio (December 1999 to March 2008). However, he was dropped from the cabinet following the general election in March, although he was one of only 15 successful MCA parliamentarians - he retained the Alor Gajah seat. During Ling’s tenure, he played a key role as party representative in the National Economic Consultative Council and in the Tunku Abdul Rahman University Council.

Fong is a blogger and a prolific writer on socio-economic issues like poverty, industrialisation and population. He has authored eight books and written 43 chapters for international journals

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dr Fong, you are the most humble person in MCA who does not want to compete no. 1 or no. 2 eventhough you are qualified. Please care for MCA to contest and lead the party.

Anonymous said...

MCA and Malaysia need your experience, expertise and leadership. You are one of the best leaders in Malaysia. Please contribute more to society through your position.

Anonymous said...

Well I hope the delegates will be wise enough again and return you as their VP. MCA has gone to the dogs because of an incapable leader who is also a coward! And he has hand picked incapable people to succeed him! And he has the audacity to claim he represents the Chinese. He must think all Chinese are as stupid as him!

Anonymous said...

MCA is not at the crossroads but, has entered into a one way traffic, to a dead end!
It is very commendable of you, to see ahead...to rebuild the party and offer your expertise and experience in area of economics. I believe, you are better served in the govt, than in your irrelevant party which the Chinese community no longer support.
Perhaps, your services will be more appreciated with the Opposition...whose aim is to dismantle the unstable structures built by UMNO-BN administration.
Dato Fong, what hope have you got to build MCA second stringers (although, I concede they may be qualified academically)to be future leaders. It is a known fact, that these so called younger leaders, went into politics not to serve the Chinese but, more as social climbers and getting rich pretending to be genuine politicians. You may not like to admit it, but it is a fact.
Dr Fong, go for the President position and overhaul MCA and make it into a mult-racial party. If you still think you can contribute to the betterment of MCA. Sadly, it will be a lost cause.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Fong,

1. Do you think if MCA will ever be able to deliver significant changes to the nation given the circumstances in the UMNO-led BN?

2. How powerful can a Deputy Minister be when a Minister is not even powerful enough plus the fact that you are from MCA not UMNO? Are you really the boss if you are a Minister from MCA? Plus, just look at the Ministry MCA MPs are placed. Even if they are positioned in the education and home ministries, do these MCA MPs (our Chinese leaders) really have the power to change?

3. How do you rate from the scale of 1 to 10, the level of influence of MCA in the BN in charting the visions, goals and objectives in the Government?

4. You mentioned, "My strength is in the area of economics. I believe that, with my knowledge, experience and expertise, I can help the party leaders to formulate an economic roadmap which in turn can contribute to our nation’s efforts in facing prevailing economics-related challenges." Again, my point is, if you succeeded doing that at MCA level but what about BN and Government? Will you or MCA be heard?

5. All these years, we the Chinese have been working damn hard, do things the hard way and just hope MCA will continue to fight for us.... Great, MCA has more ministers in cabinet. Great, 1999 election saw Chinese votes really count and a bit more respect for MCA.... But the prevailing issues are NOT about MCA but the ordinary Chinese, the working class Chinese, the young Chinese, the Chinese students, Chinese homebuyers, land owners, borrowers etc.... We all know many other issues.... So, for 50 years, MCA is still around... but MCA's original struggles slowly fade away....

6. Young Chinese, like me for one, believe Politics = Self Interest... as you said, "because I was a minister then….with vested interests." Hence, do I even dare to hope my current MCA leaders to fight for me? How can a Chief Minister from PAS (non-Chinese party) can have the courage to promise land title to Chinese settlers when in 50 years my MCA leaders did not achieve success? Yes, there were efforts by MCA, we all know.... but you see this is what I can hope for if I vote for any Opposition Party who is powerful enough! Yes, you may say these are all political motivated to gain popularity, but hey, fact of life, New Hope + How Worse Can It Be When I Am Already at Worst?

7. MCA and its leaders will have a lot to do to convince the Chinese what faded away. And a lot more to ‘educate’ the young Chinese that MCA represents them.

Life still goes on…..